Tell Federal Reps To Enforce Laws Already On The Books

Human trafficking is the acquisition of people by improper means such as force, fraud or deception, with the aim of exploiting them. Human trafficking is a crime against humanity.

The author of this website is victim of "curative rape", when men and women try to "cure" lesbians or cripple them. The idea is that lesbians can learn to be straight if forced into heterosexual sex. This has been structured by criminalizing her with discrimination tactics so she can be placed in vulnerable situations by having to be dependent upon and to service American men.

These actions have been authorized by the power of judicial abuse and tyranny of the American justice system, their Federal judges and Jews. These abusive misogynist men have sexually subjugated this woman to place under their control for the use of American men to exploit.

The U.S. Government promised her jobs through a college education. After she graduated she started a unique and successful business in the legal industry. When Napa County law enforcement officials could no longer tolerate her presence, they prosecuted her for stalking and for sex offenses indicating that they found insignificant items in or around a police officer's home. She lost her minor sons and went to prison.

After trying to purse another skill at a local college, U.S. reps illegally suspended her drivers licence then authorized the grand theft larceny of a $100k trust fund her mother left in a rightfully inherited trust. An undeterminate sum of real and personal property has been lost because of the countless damages.

Regardless of her decent, respectable, court filings at every level of state and federal courts, her voice remains unheard; even now at the U.S. District Court of Northern California in San Francisco and Oakland while they continue to authorize psychological warfare, gross neglect, excessive force and excessive punishment so that they do not have to be held accountable.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-candce/case_no-4:2007cv06376/case_id-198746/ email: dockets@justia.com

A Woman Who Is Being Beaten Into Submission

A woman was severely beaten by the state and federal judicial system and the Department of Justice over a Merry Christmas Balloon, a chrunched up piece of paper, a sea shell...misc items that a Napa, California, Sergeant found in front of a colleague home.

Kini contends that barring this plaintiff from access to evidence used to convict her is opposed by and violates the Geneva Convention standards. The actions by the U.S. Federal Government is banned as cruel, inhuman and degrading treatmentIt prohibits consequences more than actions as a permanent detainee’s treatment under a secret status equal to that of a home arrestee as an alleged sex offender.

What's allowed and what's beyond the pale includes measures that have not been prevented from inflicting "serious and nontransitory" mental harm. The techniques have been deliberately prolonged causing Kini "prolonged" mental suffering, exposing her to uncomfortable cold or heat for long periods, sleep deprivation and disorientation from the mental anguish of personal and real property deprivation.

Specific methods have involved forcing her to move from place to place, withholding food and water, using loud noise, blasting music, and sirens to induce panic to disorient her and to impair the function of her mental faculty.

Those directly responsible for the human right violations in America are, but not limited to:
United State District Court For the Northern District of California
Zimmerman, Magistrate Judge Bernard BZ
United State District Court For the Eastern District of California
David F. Levi
Sandra M. Snyder,
Gregory G. Hollows
William Shubbs
Garland E. Burrell
Napa County Consolidated Courts
Honorable Randy Bowman
Napa County Court of Napa, California
Ronald T.L. Young
Court Of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, Division One
Stein, J. Acting P.J.
Strankman, P.J.
United States Court Of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit
Circuit Judges:
O'Scannlain,
Fernandez
Tashima
T.G. Nelson
Kleinfeld
Farris
Brunetti
Silverman
Leavy
Berzon
Supreme Court Of California
George-Chief Justice

Dedicated to public awareness for women who are treated as inferior or as second-class citizens in many cultures, including the United States. Prejudices against them are deep-rooted. Gender-based violence in all its forms is an ongoing problem even in the so-called developed world. Many must suffer needlessly because they are invisible in society. This shameful fact of life is today’s most pervasive human rights challenge.

The Zodiac Killer Finally Retires

A New Lead In The Zodiac Killer Case

The Zodiac Killer murdered five people and critically wounded two others in Northern California between December 1968 and October 1969. An individual who identified himself with the moniker claimed to be the murderer and frequently corresponded with newspapers in California, in some cases submitting enciphered messages with his letters that may contain some evidence of his identity.

A top notch mystery since the times of Jack the Ripper may have been solved. A law student from Napa, California, was maliciously prosecuted extending over the International Human Rights Guidelines. While battling for reconcilliation, she stumbles upon and unravels evidence that is eerily connected to the Zodiac. Review the evidence at http://kinispolarbear.wordpress.com yourself and see if she has not discovered a lead.

Unfair discrimination ruling signals what’s ahead

Kini’s Comment to:

Bonnie Erbes’ article re:
Unfair discrimination ruling signals what’s ahead

This comment is in response to your article about Ledbetter who began a career with earnings comparable to that of her male colleagues but who lost her right to sue for sex discrimination as decided by the famously narrow 5-4 Roberts Court ruling because her claim was late.

The Supreme Court decided to turn down a female worker’s lawsuit against an employer who was under paid compared to her male coworkers does not only signal what’s ahead but also leaves behind a lagging indicator showing some women will never have a chance no matter what they do. If you don’t believe me, check out http://kinispolarbear.bravehost.com

The disparities will never be reduced with the continued manifestation and arbitrariness of the law.

Trying visualizing the life of a female outsider described at website http://kinispolarbear.bravehost.com replete with timely claims filed with ALL levels of the judicial system only to live a live shrouded in terror.

Try visualizing keeping a claim alive for decades so that the Courts can’t declare, a case “should apply only once the person ‘knows or should have known of the discrimination”. So the Courts can’t declare “and to avoid against single discriminatory acts such as hirings, firings and promotions, not in cases that build up slowly over time”.

Try visualizing how the public uses hostility, discrimination, and harassment to build up your case so that it can be dismissed for just those reasons.

Try visualizing a talented female being unfairly subjected to biased views of women’ rights for countless years because white males feel battered by the advancement of women and minorities.

Try visualizing years of distrust, hatred, being alone, and the unfairness of losing everything you worked for your entire life only to see others gain. Try visualizing what it is like wondering when will it be when some friend turn up as a surprise witness perjuring their testimony against you in some Court for their own ill will and agenda.

Matter of fact, try visualizing a person reaching out for years for help only to receive stone cold silence as an answer only to be locked up in a corner with no where to run. And, then finding people like you who finally wake up and take notice after thousands of I told you so.

Worst of all, imagine having to live your life amongst a bunch of morons who don't have a clue of what's right or wrong.

And, if you can’t visualize this, just check out my website at http://kinispolarbear.bravehost.com and you will see not only what is to come but what has clearly invaded the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, G.A. res. 39/46, [annex, 39 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 197, U.N. Doc. A/39/51 (1984)], entered into force June 26, 1987.

This Information Is A Stead Fast

Amended Draft Of Appeal

With Further Pending Investigation

PART I

Article I
1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term "torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes to punish her for an act she has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing her, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.

Article 2
1. California State Parties have failed to take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in the territory under its jurisdiction which includes the State of Oregon.

2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.

The Question

DOES KINI HAVE TO SUFFER FURTHER COLLATERAL LOSSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY THROUGH THE USE OF PUBLIC MENACING OF NEIGHBORS INFLICTED BY OR AT THE INSTIGATION OF OR WITH THE CONSENT OR ACQUIESCENCE OF A PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR OTHER PERSON ACTING IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY?

3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.

Such State shall immediately make a preliminary inquiry into the facts.

Article 3

1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.

2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.

Article 4
1. Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture.

2. Each State Party shall make these offences punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature.

Article 5
1. Each State Party shall take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences referred to in article 4 in the following cases:

(a) When the offences are committed in any territory under its jurisdiction ... in that State;

(b) When the alleged offender is a national of that State;

(c) When the victim is a national of that State if that State considers it appropriate.

2. Each State Party shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over such offences in cases where the alleged offender is present in any territory under its jurisdiction and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the States mentioned in paragraph 1 of this article.

3. This Convention does not exclude any criminal jurisdiction exercised in accordance with internal law

Article 7
1. The State Party in the territory under whose jurisdiction a person alleged to have committed any offence referred to in article 4 is found shall in the cases contemplated in article 5, if it does not extradite him, submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution.

2. These authorities shall take their decision in the same manner as in the case of any ordinary offence of a serious nature under the law of that State. In the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 2, the standards of evidence required for prosecution and conviction shall in no way be less stringent than those which apply in the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 1.

Article 9
1. States Parties shall afford one another the greatest measure of assistance in connection with criminal proceedings brought in respect of any of the offences referred to in article 4, including the supply of all evidence at their disposal necessary for the proceedings.

2. States Parties shall carry out their obligations under paragraph I of this article in conformity with any treaties on mutual judicial assistance that may exist between them.

Article 11
Each State Party shall keep under systematic review interrogation rules, instructions, methods and practices as well as arrangements for the custody and treatment of persons subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment in any territory under its jurisdiction, with a view to preventing any cases of torture.

Article 12
Each State Party shall ensure that its competent authorities proceed to a prompt and impartial investigation, wherever there is reasonable ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed in any territory under its jurisdiction.

Article 13
Each State Party shall ensure that any individual who alleges he has been subjected to torture in any territory under its jurisdiction has the right to complain to, and to have his case promptly and impartially examined by, its competent authorities. Steps shall be taken to ensure that the complainant and witnesses are protected against all ill-treatment or intimidation as a consequence of his complaint or any evidence given.

Article 14
1. Each State Party shall ensure in its legal system that the victim of an act of torture obtains redress and has an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation, including the means for as full rehabilitation as possible. In the event of the death of the victim as a result of an act of torture, his dependants shall be entitled to compensation.

2. Nothing in this article shall affect any right of the victim or other persons to compensation which may exist under national law.

Article 15
Each State Party shall ensure that any statement which is established to have been made as a result of torture shall not be invoked as evidence in any proceedings, except against a person accused of torture as evidence that the statement was made.

Article 16
1. Each State Party shall undertake to prevent in any territory under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment which do not amount to torture as defined in article 1, when such acts are committed by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. In particular, the obligations contained in articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 shall apply with the substitution for references to torture of references to other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Routinely Dismissed Cases Involve Human Right Violations

Kini contends that barring this plaintiff from access to evidence used to convict her is
opposed by and violates the Geneva Convention standards. The actions by the U.S. Federal Government is banned as cruel, inhuman and degrading treatmentIt prohibits consequences more than actions as a permanent detainee’s treatment under a secret status equal to that of a home arrestee as an alleged sex offender.

What's allowed and what's beyond the pale includes measures that have not been prevented from inflicting "serious and nontransitory" mental harm. The techniques have been deliberately prolonged causing Kini "prolonged" mental suffering, exposing her to uncomfortable cold or heat for long periods, sleep deprivation and disorientation from the mental anguish of personal and real property deprivation.

Specific methods have involved forcing her to move from place to place, withholding food and water, using loud noise, blasting music, and sirens to induce panic to disorient her and to impair the function of her mental faculty.

Those directly responsible for the human right violations in America are, but not limited to:

United State District Court For the Northern District of California

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California

Zimmerman, Magistrate Judge Bernard BZ

United State District Court For the Eastern District of California

http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caed/staticOther/page_467.htm

David F. Levi
Sandra M. Snyder,
Gregory G. Hollows
William Shubbs
Garland E. Burrell

Napa County Consolidated Courts

http://www.bullysurvivor.blogspot.com

Honorable Randy Bowman

Napa County Court of Napa, California

http://www.napa.courts.ca.gov/Family/family_domestic%20violence.htm

Ronald T.L. Young

Court Of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, Division One

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/courtsofappeal/

Stein, J. Acting P.J.
Strankman, P.J.

United States Court Of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/

Circuit Judges:
O'Scannlain,
Fernandez
Tashima
T.G. Nelson
Kleinfeld
Farris
Brunetti
Silverman
Leavy
Berzon

Supreme Court Of California
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/

George-Chief Justice


Maxxhits.com
- FREE Search Engine Submission

Click here to submit your URL to over 8000 search engines,
directories and links pages Free. Boost your website's traffic fast!!!

SearchHippo

Search Engine Optimization and Free Submission
My site is listed at SurfGopher

The Honorable Jewish Peace Maker

Dear Women:

Today's word: When you talk about men who have caused you so much grief in your life that you can barely stand up, do people feel sorry for them? When I discuss this "man", Randy Bowman, a retired police officer in the City Of Napa, California, and I compare him to the "man", Larry Singleton, (You know the guy that cut off the arms of the girl), people actually feel sorry for him! It just doesn't seem to matter that in the spirit of the law, Bowman did the same thing to me! ALL TOGETHER NOW... B H for Randy Bowman!

Reminds me of that story my Aunty Helen used to tell us: She escaped through the Nazi Holocaust (compare the American Holocaust) and was shining the shoes of a Nazi soldier. The Nazi was sitting there ranting about what he would do if he found one Jew. He did not know that my Aunt was one!

Moral of the story: The abusees have now become the abusers.

Did This Police Officer Go Beyond The Scope Of His

Duties?